I'm fairly new to Rust so I'm not sure if this is intended, but I am running into this issue while storing a Weak inside a derive(Debug) struct. I checked the Rust source and found this line:
#[stable(feature = "arc_weak", since = "1.4.0")]
impl<T: ?Sized> fmt::Debug for Weak<T> {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
write!(f, "(Weak)")
}
}
However, this only implements Debug for Weak, not Weak<T, A>.
Should this be changed to say Weak<T, A> instead? I'm happy to make a PR to rust-lang that changes it to:
#[stable(feature = "arc_weak", since = "1.4.0")]
impl<T: ?Sized, A: Allocator> fmt::Debug for Weak<T, A> {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
write!(f, "(Weak)")
}
}
Additionally, though out of the scope of this issue, is there a good reason that this debug function does not try to display the Option that it implicitly contains?
I'm fairly new to Rust so I'm not sure if this is intended, but I am running into this issue while storing a Weak inside a derive(Debug) struct. I checked the Rust source and found this line:
However, this only implements Debug for Weak, not Weak<T, A>.
Should this be changed to say Weak<T, A> instead? I'm happy to make a PR to rust-lang that changes it to:
Additionally, though out of the scope of this issue, is there a good reason that this debug function does not try to display the Option that it implicitly contains?