Report thread safety issue with PyO3's PyCFunction::new_closure#2960
Merged
Conversation
PyCFunction::new_closurePyCFunction::new_closure
Closed
LawnGnome
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2026
Contributor
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Affected crate(s)
pyo3(40M recent downloads per crates.io)Links to upstream issue(s) or PR(s)
PyO3/pyo3#6096
Severity
PyCFunction::new_closuremissed aSyncbound on the closure to be wrapped as a Python callable. Older Python releases would have been less likely to observe data races due to partial serial execution imposed by the Global Interpreter Lock. As the Python ecosystem transitions to free-threaded Python, theSyncbound is critical for thread safety.This API is not the primary mechanism by which user code produces Python callables (typically done by
#[pyfunction]and#[pymethods]proc macros), however it seems highly likely that users will have written thread-unsafe code using this API. PyO3 happened to have such a case in its own test suite! (Was using aRefCellinside the closure in question.)Checklist
RUSTSEC-0000-0000as the IDdatefield is set to the public disclosure date