Bump autoprefixer and PostCSS versions#119
Closed
alexhrao wants to merge 1 commit intosindresorhus:mainfrom
Closed
Bump autoprefixer and PostCSS versions#119alexhrao wants to merge 1 commit intosindresorhus:mainfrom
alexhrao wants to merge 1 commit intosindresorhus:mainfrom
Conversation
Owner
|
#114 was different. There they just bumped minor versions. |
Author
|
Aw man, I was hoping to get my name in the committer list ;) thanks for looking at this so quickly! Cheers |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes #118
I'm a big fan of this - it really saves me so much time! I noticed earlier you had rejected a PR that bumped versions in the package.json; however, I don't think your response (#114) is working out as you'd expect, since two of these dependencies (
autoprefixerandpostcss) aren't updating themselves correctly (I'm thinking it might be because it's a major version change? Unclear). Regardless, these pass the built-in tests, so I don't see an issue in doing this? Let me know if I'm mistaken!Cheers,
Alex