Skip to content

Fix order_type for generic non-simple absolute fields#1859

Merged
thofma merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
th/fixsomething
Apr 26, 2025
Merged

Fix order_type for generic non-simple absolute fields#1859
thofma merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
th/fixsomething

Conversation

@thofma
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@thofma thofma commented Apr 26, 2025

No description provided.

@thofma thofma changed the title fix: order_type for generic non-simple absolute fields Fix order_type for generic non-simple absolute fields Apr 26, 2025
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 26, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.57%. Comparing base (12f7a59) to head (4e6b6a8).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/NumField/NfAbs.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1859      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.60%   76.57%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         362      363       +1     
  Lines      115063   115064       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        88140    88108      -32     
- Misses      26923    26956      +33     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/NumFieldOrd/NfOrd/MaxOrd/MaxOrdNS.jl 86.41% <100.00%> (ø)
src/NumField/NfAbs.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 28 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@thofma thofma enabled auto-merge (squash) April 26, 2025 19:10
@thofma thofma merged commit d09592d into master Apr 26, 2025
18 checks passed
@thofma thofma deleted the th/fixsomething branch April 26, 2025 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant