placement-rule: move placement rule initialization after LoadStores#9616
placement-rule: move placement rule initialization after LoadStores#9616ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intotikv:masterfrom
Conversation
…nce test coverage for store labels and leader transfer Signed-off-by: okjiang <819421878@qq.com>
b755465 to
e953427
Compare
|
/retest |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9616 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 76.61% 76.61% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 483 483
Lines 75978 75980 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 58214 58215 +1
- Misses 14194 14196 +2
+ Partials 3570 3569 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bufferflies, lhy1024 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
close tikv#9602 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
close tikv#9602 Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
…nce test coverage for store labels and leader transfer
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: Close #9602
What is changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Release note