use new glimmer ElementNode sub nodes#696
Conversation
4e5ee8b to
d7f88cb
Compare
23ef8a2 to
f0bf4c4
Compare
|
@NullVoxPopuli any idea how I can fix this: |
|
Does skipLibCheck help? Otherwise, glimmer has more bugs we need to fix (all relative imports should always use extensions when using node16, so it shouldn't be too bad of a fix) |
yes, it helped! |
|
@patricklx would there be any noticeable editor behavior changes with this PR? (or is it "just the same, but using the new parser capabilities"?) |
|
i'm not seeing and difference |
NullVoxPopuli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's block on glimmerjs/glimmer-vm#1555
And get that update in here, too once released
|
@patricklx new versions published, can you try the .1 release? |
|
nope, some new errors-... microsoft/TypeScript#52529 looks like @ef4 knows something about this |
|
ah yeah, we're probably blocked on ember-source needing to actually ship as a |
|
@NullVoxPopuli the error is under @types folder. |
|
does changing all of |
it fixes some errors, still, at the end it says |
|
Ahh, yeah, probably because all the private relative imports need extensions at that point. Hmm |
|
I've added skipLibCheck back. It doesn't seem we can build without it. |
|
@patricklx FYI 0.89.0 is out with glimmerjs/glimmer-vm#1568 The information you need should now be in Should also fix #706 |
3fedc71 to
a3e719f
Compare
|
@patricklx i think this is unblocked now? |
|
re-created as #839 |
there are now also following nodes:
example:
afterwards completions/validations can be add for attributes and element tags
In #663