The AppStream specification for package metadata is now used by many (perhaps most) Linux distribution package managers. It now supports font packages as well: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Fonts.html
Consequently, it would be good if the UFR structure included a skeleton file for this format, too, since it would encourage many open-font developers to get the metadata formatted properly from the get-go.
While the AppStream team has been generating these files for existing packages (see https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Fonts.html ), that's far from ideal. Just including the right sample text is something that the designer is better equipped to do than anyone else....
The AppStream specification for package metadata is now used by many (perhaps most) Linux distribution package managers. It now supports font packages as well: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Fonts.html
Consequently, it would be good if the UFR structure included a skeleton file for this format, too, since it would encourage many open-font developers to get the metadata formatted properly from the get-go.
While the AppStream team has been generating these files for existing packages (see https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Fonts.html ), that's far from ideal. Just including the right sample text is something that the designer is better equipped to do than anyone else....