Add support for new interpretation of fractional perms in pure function preconditions#822
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Dspil
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2025
jcp19
changed the title
ArquintL
reviewed
Jan 17, 2025
ArquintL
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2025
Co-authored-by: Linard Arquint <ArquintL@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes done in accordance to the corresponding change in Viper (viperproject/silver#816).
The default is still Viper's old interpretation for fractional permissions because our case studies all use the old semantics, but we should switch in the future because the new interpretation leads to more concise specs.