Address checksum validation

[iamdefinitelyahuman]

What I did

Validate address checksums during AST generation.

Closes #2216

How I did it

Since we only use Hex for address and bytes32, I've moved the checksum validation into Hex.validate. This is the earliest point we can catch the issue, and ensures it can't be missed in one of several spots within type checking.

How to verify it

Run the tests. I've added some cases to verify this.

Cute Animal Picture

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #2229 (284c6f3) into master (3f7b622) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 85.71%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2229   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.36%   85.36%           
=======================================
  Files          84       84           
  Lines        8541     8544    +3     
  Branches     2064     2065    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         7291     7294    +3     
  Misses        744      744           
  Partials      506      506           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
vyper/context/types/value/address.py	91.66% <50.00%> (ø)
vyper/ast/nodes.py	93.49% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3f7b622...284c6f3. Read the comment docs.