Add test-specific repro test markers

[dougiesquire]

This PR adds some test-specific markers to the reproducibility tests to allow finer-grain control over which repro tests are run.

Closes #136

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.40%. Comparing base (4c4de2d) to head (0e96a1e).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #137      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.18%   75.40%   +0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines         927      935       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          697      705       +8     
  Misses        230      230              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jo-basevi]

Thanks @dougiesquire, looks good to me

[dougiesquire]

Because we've now renamed markers, I'll need to update config repos that are configured to use model-config-tests main as soon as this is merged.

It's probably also worth tagging another release, so we don't end up with a horrible mix of markers in the ci.json - e.g. https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-om3-configs/blob/main/config/ci.json

[jo-basevi]

Good point, I agree that a new release would be good - it's probably time to actually start incrementing the major version now that old markers wouldn't work..

[dougiesquire]

Okay so I'll tag v0.1.0 once this is merged? I'm going to get the PRs to the config repos ready to go to minimize the period that things don't work.

[aidanheerdegen]

LGTM2