Conversation
|
Hi @jfy133, thanks for the ping. I do not need to be a contributor. Regarding your text, it looks mostly fine. I think I seem to remember from Johannes that the damage pattern would in fact imply that it was already partly single-stranded at life-time, which is why it contains so much damage throughout. In the paper we wrote:
I think the single-strandedness is an important piece of information to explain why C-T changes are not so confined to the boundaries of the fragments (which are usually the overhanging parts and therefore single-stranded) but are seen throughout. The last paragraph also should be changed slightly, as suggested my inline-comment |
Co-authored-by: Stephan Schiffels <stephan_schiffels@mac.com>
Co-authored-by: Stephan Schiffels <stephan_schiffels@mac.com>
|
Waiting on OK from Johannes (and maybe @wangke16 if she sees this) |
To close #37
Originally suggested for addition by Johannes Krause, but maybe @stschiff and/or @wangke16 can comment on my phrasing/re-writing of their very concise summary in the paper (and of course we can add you both to the contributors list if you wish : ))
For reference, the rendered page looks like this: