Skip to content

New Experiment amip-noirr#138

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
new_experiment__amip-noirr
Open

New Experiment amip-noirr#138
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
new_experiment__amip-noirr

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request was automatically created by a GitHub Actions workflow.

Adding the following new data.

{
    "id": "amip-noirr",
    "type": [
        "wcrp:experiment",
        "cmip7"
    ],
    "activity": [
        "IRRMIP"
    ],
    "description": "1. switching off the irrigation in the experiment historical  3. This is only for model groups whose amip simulations do include irrigation.",
    "label": "amip-noirr",
    "long-label": "AMIP with irrigation switched off",
    "minimum-number-of-years": "122",
    "model-realms": [
        {
            "id": "agcm",
            "is-required": true
        },
        {
            "id": "bgc",
            "is-required": true
        },
        {
            "id": "land",
            "is-required": true
        }
    ],
    "parent-experiment": [
        "amip"
    ],
    "start-date": "1901-01-01",
    "sub-experiment": "none",
    "tier": "2"
}

Resolves #62

@github-actions github-actions Bot force-pushed the new_experiment__amip-noirr branch from f0a24b4 to 6cdb8e4 Compare March 26, 2025 19:05
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@matthew-mizielinski matthew-mizielinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok to me, only question would be whether the use of the term amip here is ok -- @taylor13 any objections to this name given that the experiment starts in 1901, i.e. before the amip experiment (and its forcing)?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@matthew-mizielinski matthew-mizielinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok to me, only question would be whether the use of the term amip here is ok -- @taylor13 any objections to this name given that the experiment starts in 1901, i.e. before the amip experiment (and its forcing)?

@wolfiex wolfiex force-pushed the main branch 8 times, most recently from 6122321 to 8b753de Compare March 27, 2025 18:49
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@matthew-mizielinski matthew-mizielinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes to amip-noirr.json look ok, not sure parent experiment is correct though

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

github-actions Bot commented Apr 1, 2025

This pull request was automatically created by a GitHub Actions workflow.

Adding the following new data:

```js
{
"id": "amip-noirr",
"type": [
    "wcrp:experiment",
    "cmip7"
],
"activity": [
    "irrmip"
],
"description": "1. Switching off the irrigation in the experiment historical  3. This is only for model groups whose amip simulations do include irrigation.",
"label": "amip-noirr",
"long-label": "AMIP with irrigation switched off",
"minimum-number-of-years": "122",
"model-realms": [
    {
        "id": "agcm",
        "is-required": true
    },
    {
        "id": "bgc",
        "is-required": true
    },
    {
        "id": "land",
        "is-required": true
    }
],
"parent-experiment": [
    "amip"
],
"start-date": "1901-01-01",
"sub-experiment": "none",
"tier": "2"

}
```

Resolves #62

@github-actions github-actions Bot force-pushed the new_experiment__amip-noirr branch from 6cdb8e4 to fd30be6 Compare April 1, 2025 18:54
@wolfiex wolfiex added the question Further information is requested label Apr 1, 2025
@durack1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

durack1 commented May 6, 2025

@CMIP-IPO can we see if IRRMIP plans to continue to be part of CMIP7? It seems their protocol document etc are not longer accessible

@eleanororourke @wolfiex @bethdingley ping just so we're all synced

This was referenced May 6, 2025
@znichollscr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Blocked by #287 and finalisation of experiment schema/data model I believe (but translating this content should be easy once those are done, so best to leave this open I think)

@wolfiex wolfiex added the keep-open Safety label — do not close this issue automatically. label Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

keep-open Safety label — do not close this issue automatically. question Further information is requested

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New Experiment amip-noirr

5 participants