Conversation
f0a24b4 to
6cdb8e4
Compare
matthew-mizielinski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks ok to me, only question would be whether the use of the term amip here is ok -- @taylor13 any objections to this name given that the experiment starts in 1901, i.e. before the amip experiment (and its forcing)?
matthew-mizielinski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks ok to me, only question would be whether the use of the term amip here is ok -- @taylor13 any objections to this name given that the experiment starts in 1901, i.e. before the amip experiment (and its forcing)?
6122321 to
8b753de
Compare
matthew-mizielinski
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
changes to amip-noirr.json look ok, not sure parent experiment is correct though
} |
6cdb8e4 to
fd30be6
Compare
|
@CMIP-IPO can we see if IRRMIP plans to continue to be part of CMIP7? It seems their protocol document etc are not longer accessible @eleanororourke @wolfiex @bethdingley ping just so we're all synced |
|
Blocked by #287 and finalisation of experiment schema/data model I believe (but translating this content should be easy once those are done, so best to leave this open I think) |
This pull request was automatically created by a GitHub Actions workflow.
Adding the following new data.
Resolves #62