This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 6, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
Fix #5062: Update notification is no longer modal #5085
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now we're checking for update regardless of whether "skipUpdateCheck" is specified in the UrlParams or not. When this call is in the old location, it won't be invoked if "skipUpdateCheck" is specified. Not sure how to test with UrlParams. @gruehle, we need your opinion on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "skipUpdateCheck" is required for test windows to work correctly. Without that test, every test window would check for updated.
The call in the old location also checks "inBrowser", since we don't want to do update notification checks while running in browser.
@TomMalbran - is there a reason why this check was moved here? If not, it would be best to keep it in brackets.js.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @gruehle. Tom moves it here because the old location is too early to show the update dialog and consequently the dialog is losing focus to the main editor causing issue #5602.
@TomMalbran I think we can keep this call back in brackets.js, but in a different location where we're done with asynchronous loading of the editor. That is, moves the entire if block that contains this call to the line above
PerfUtils.addMeasurement("Application Startup");.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RaymondLim I was thinking of just moving this block to the old location. I will test if that works, but it might make sense to do it in that way. If it doesn't work i'll test that.
Note: It seems to work fine.