This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 6, 2021. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
New Insert Code Hints with Tab Preference #6984
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -446,7 +446,6 @@ define(function (require, exports, module) { | |
| updateListeners(); | ||
| if (!doNotSave) { | ||
| prefs.set(PREF_ENABLED, _enabled); | ||
| prefs.save(); | ||
| } | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I noticed that this isn't needed anymore with the latest API change.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nice catch on this. |
||
|
|
||
| // run immediately | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This function exists to get called by extensions, so this preference can be overriden (even in the pref file) by an extension.
I don't think this is what we want.
We could let extensions use 3 states: forced tab, forced no tab and default (use the pref).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, this would also change the Preference in the file which might not be desirable. I think we should just leave the variable as before, but with no initial value. This function would change that value to true or false. We can then add another if on line 478 to use this variable if it is not undefined, and leave the else after to fallback to the preference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or it might be reasonable to just deprecate or remove this API. Afaik there's only one extension that uses it, and it would be basically obsoleted by the new preference anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I think that would work better. We could leave the code like this and just add a deprecation warning, to eventually remove this function. Or maybe @iwehrman could upgrade his extension to just set the pref to true and we just remove this function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we shouldn't rely on the extension this much. I mean, we currently deprecate or break so many APIs that this shouldn't be an issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the final solution? Just remove the API?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It sounds like we're all ok with that, yeah.