[BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids by kavilla · Pull Request #2277 · opensearch-project/OpenSearch-Dashboards

kavilla · 2022-09-06T22:50:53Z

Description

Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array.
This PR:
#2232

Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array.

Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned null or _local, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass null as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes.

Now this function will return _local if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version.

Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response.
Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla kavilla414@gmail.com

Original Issue

#2203

Check List

kavilla · 2022-09-06T22:51:43Z

Thanks @AMoo-Miki for this help kavilla#45

codecov-commenter · 2022-09-06T23:30:38Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 56.25000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 66.77%. Comparing base (4a06f5a) to head (7871fd9).
⚠️ Report is 2454 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...nsearch/version_check/ensure_opensearch_version.ts	56.25%	0 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2277      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.77%   66.77%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        3133     3133              
  Lines       60086    60084       -2     
  Branches     9154     9156       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        40121    40119       -2     
+ Misses      17775    17772       -3     
- Partials     2190     2193       +3

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

joshuarrrr · 2022-09-06T23:37:53Z


 import { timer, of, from, Observable } from 'rxjs';
 import { map, distinctUntilChanged, catchError, exhaustMap, mergeMap } from 'rxjs/operators';
-import { get } from 'lodash';


Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: opensearch-project#2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: opensearch-project#2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 3496526)

…2283) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 3496526) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

opensearch-trigger-bot · 2022-09-07T23:53:22Z

The backport to 2.0 failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-2.0 2.0
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-2.0
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-2277-to-2.0
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 349652685f84aa0c058315d846b110fcf8d23ee2
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-2277-to-2.0
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-2.0

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.0 and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-2277-to-2.0.

opensearch-trigger-bot · 2022-09-07T23:53:26Z

The backport to 2.2 failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-2.2 2.2
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-2.2
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-2277-to-2.2
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 349652685f84aa0c058315d846b110fcf8d23ee2
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-2277-to-2.2
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-2.2

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.2 and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-2277-to-2.2.

opensearch-trigger-bot · 2022-09-07T23:53:41Z

The backport to 1.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-1.x 1.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-1.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-2277-to-1.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 349652685f84aa0c058315d846b110fcf8d23ee2
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-2277-to-1.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-1.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 1.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-2277-to-1.x.

opensearch-trigger-bot · 2022-09-07T23:53:45Z

The backport to 2.1 failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-2.1 2.1
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-2.1
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-2277-to-2.1
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 349652685f84aa0c058315d846b110fcf8d23ee2
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-2277-to-2.1
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-2.1

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.1 and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-2277-to-2.1.

Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 3496526)

opensearch-trigger-bot · 2022-09-08T19:22:19Z

The backport to 2.0 failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-2.0 2.0
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-2.0
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-2277-to-2.0
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 349652685f84aa0c058315d846b110fcf8d23ee2
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-2277-to-2.0
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-2.0

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.0 and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-2277-to-2.0.

…ch-project#2277) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: opensearch-project#2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: opensearch-project#2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2296) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 3496526) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2297) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 3496526) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2300) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2298) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2300) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e10ba34)

…2300) (#2304) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e10ba34) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2300) (#2302) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e10ba34) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2300) (#2301) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e10ba34) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

Add more tests to verify logic added here: opensearch-project#2277 That makes a request for nodes info with a list of node ids. Issue: n/a Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

* [BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids (#2277) (#2300) (#2301) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e10ba34) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> * change version Signed-off-by: Tao liu <liutaoaz@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Tao liu <liutaoaz@amazon.com> Co-authored-by: opensearch-trigger-bot[bot] <98922864+opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…2300) (#2303) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: #2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: #2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e10ba34) Co-authored-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…ch-project#2277) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: opensearch-project#2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: opensearch-project#2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sergey V. Osipov <sipopo@yandex.ru>

…ch-project#2277) (opensearch-project#2298) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: opensearch-project#2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: opensearch-project#2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com>

…ch-project#2277) Original implementation incorrectly assumed the return list of nodes was an object array. This PR: opensearch-project#2232 Addressed the return but didn't catch the nodes.find in the return which is a function for an array. Also, refactors to return a list of node_ids because the original implementation indicated that it should but it can return node ids but it never did. It only returned `null` or `_local`, the problem with this approach is that it doesn't expect valid node version with different DIs or filter out nodes when we pass `null` as the node ID for the node info call because it was fan out the request to all nodes. Now this function will return `_local` if all the nodes share the same cluster_id using a greedy approach since we can assume it is all the same version. Will return node ids, if the cluster_id are different so it will pass a CSV to the node info call and return the info for those nodes. And null if no cluster_id is present, ie, fan out the response. Original issue: opensearch-project#2203 Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <kavilla414@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sergey V. Osipov <sipopo@yandex.ru>

kavilla requested a review from a team as a code owner September 6, 2022 22:50

kavilla added v2.3.0 backport 2.x labels Sep 6, 2022

joshuarrrr previously approved these changes Sep 6, 2022

View reviewed changes

Flyingliuhub reviewed Sep 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/core/server/opensearch/version_check/ensure_opensearch_version.ts

Flyingliuhub reviewed Sep 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/core/server/opensearch/version_check/ensure_opensearch_version.ts

kavilla dismissed joshuarrrr’s stale review via 7871fd9 September 7, 2022 20:02

kavilla force-pushed the avillk/imp_filtered_nodes2 branch from eaad89b to 7871fd9 Compare September 7, 2022 20:02

kavilla requested review from Flyingliuhub and joshuarrrr September 7, 2022 20:04

ashwin-pc approved these changes Sep 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

CCongWang approved these changes Sep 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

joshuarrrr approved these changes Sep 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

AMoo-Miki approved these changes Sep 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

Flyingliuhub approved these changes Sep 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

kavilla merged commit 3496526 into opensearch-project:main Sep 7, 2022

opensearch-trigger-bot bot mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2022

[Backport 2.x] [BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids #2283

Merged

kavilla added backport 2.0 labels Sep 7, 2022

opensearch-trigger-bot bot mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2022

[Backport 2.2] [BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids #2296

Merged

opensearch-trigger-bot bot mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2022

[Backport 2.1] [BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids #2297

Merged

kavilla added backport 2.0 and removed backport 2.0 labels Sep 8, 2022

kavilla mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2022

[Backport 2.0] [BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids #2298

Merged

kavilla mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2022

[Backport 1.x] [BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids #2300

Merged

Flyingliuhub mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2022

[1.3-healthcheck] Cherry-pick the healthcheck bug fixes #2277 #2306

Merged

7 tasks

ananzh added the v1.3.6 label Jan 26, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids#2277

[BUG] fix healthcheck logic to expect object and return ids#2277
kavilla merged 1 commit intoopensearch-project:mainfrom
kavilla:avillk/imp_filtered_nodes2

kavilla commented Sep 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

kavilla commented Sep 6, 2022

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Sep 6, 2022 •

edited by codecov bot

Loading

Uh oh!

joshuarrrr Sep 6, 2022

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

Conversation

kavilla commented Sep 6, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Original Issue

Check List

Uh oh!

kavilla commented Sep 6, 2022

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Sep 6, 2022 • edited by codecov bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

joshuarrrr Sep 6, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Uh oh!

opensearch-trigger-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

kavilla commented Sep 6, 2022 •

edited

Loading

codecov-commenter commented Sep 6, 2022 •

edited by codecov bot

Loading