Added chained-comparison message example

[matusvalo]

Co-authored-by: Vladyslav Krylasov vladyslav.krylasov@gmail.com

Type of Changes

	Type
	🐛 Bug fix
	✨ New feature
	🔨 Refactoring
✓	📜 Docs

Description

Related: #5953

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Aren't good and bad inverted here ?

[matusvalo]

Aren't good and bad inverted here ?

https://vald-phoenix.github.io/pylint-errors/plerr/errors/refactoring/R1716

matus@MacBook-Pro:~/dev/pylint/doc$ cat test.py
a = int(input())
b = int(input())
c = int(input())
if a < b and b < c:
    pass
matus@MacBook-Pro:~/dev/pylint/doc$ pylint test.py
************* Module test
test.py:1:0: C0114: Missing module docstring (missing-module-docstring)
test.py:4:3: R1716: Simplify chained comparison between the operands (chained-comparison)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 6.00/10 (previous run: 6.00/10, +0.00)

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

I mean the a < b and b < c: # [chained-comparison] is in good.py file not in bad.py. Probably something that our documentation tests should catch now that I think of it (nothing should be raised for good.py and at least one message for bad.py).

[matusvalo]

Yes you are right nie I see it. I will fix it.

[matusvalo]

Aren't good and bad inverted here ?

fixed

[matusvalo]

Probably something that our documentation tests should catch now that I think of it

created #6145

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Thanks for the generic fix, much appreciated !