-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
B1: Project Approach Questionnaire
NJ edited this page Apr 29, 2020
·
11 revisions
Project name
| Project: | -------- | Name: | -------- |
| Date: | -------- | Position: | -------- |
Indicate the closest collective opinion:
| Ref | Statement | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly disagree | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | All members of the project understand and accept the [project management] approach (Philosophy, Principles and Practices) | ||||||
| 2 | The Research Sponsor and the Research Visionary demonstrate clear and proactive ownership of the project. | ||||||
| 3 | The research vision driving the project is clearly stated and understood by all members of the project team | ||||||
| 4 | All project participants understand and accept that on-time delivery of an acceptable solution is the primary measure of success for the project | ||||||
| 5 | The requirements can be prioritised and there is confidence that cost and time commitments can be met by flexing the scope of what's delivered. | ||||||
| 6 | All members of the project team accept that requirements should only be defined at a high level in the early phases of the project and that detail will emerge as development progresses. | ||||||
| 7 | All members of the project team accept that change in requirements is inevitable and that it is only by embracing change that the right solution will be delivered. | ||||||
| 8 | The Research Sponsor and Research Visionary understand that active intellectual involvement is essential and have the willingness and authority to commit appropriate research resources to the project. | ||||||
| 9 | It is possible for members of the Solution Development Team to work collaboratively throughout the project. | ||||||
| 10 | Empowerment of all members of the Solution Development Team is appropriate and sufficient to support the day-to-day decision-making needed to rapidly evolve the solution in short, focussed timeboxes | ||||||
| 11 | The DSDM roles and responsibilities are appropriately allocated and all role holders understand and accept the responsibilities associated with their role. | ||||||
| 12 | The Solution Development team has the appropriate collective knowledge and skills (soft skills and technical skills) to collaboratively evolve an optimal research solution. | ||||||
| 13 | Solution Development Team members are allocated to the project at an appropriate and consistent level sufficient to fully support the DSDM timeboxing practice | ||||||
| 14 | Tools and collaborative working practices within the Solution Development Team are sufficient to allow effective Iterative Development of the solution. | ||||||
| 15 | All necessary review and testing activity is fully integrated within the Iterative Development practice. | ||||||
| 16 | Project progress is measured primarily through the incremental, demonstrable delivery of research value. | ||||||
| 17 | There are no mandatory standards or other constraints in place that will prevent the application of the DSDM Philosophy and Practices on this project. |
| General comments on suitability or risk associated with the DSDM approach: | --------------------- |
|
|
For guidance in completing this documentation stage please see the PAQ guidelines.
Software Development Life Cycle. King's Digital Lab. 2025
-
- A2: Terms of Reference guidance
- B2: Project Approach Questionnaire guidance
- F2: Feasibility guidance
- I2: Product Quote guidance
- J2: Statement of Work guidance
- Data Management Plan guidance and AHRC template
- L2: Project Review Record guidance
- N2: Web Hosting and Infrastructure Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Q2: Decommissioning Authorisation guidance
-
Monitoring Methods - In progress
- Z1: RSE Team Mission and Activities
- V1: How do we approach analysis when a project is funded
- Meetings
- Peer review
- Task management
- Budgeting and resource planning
-
Scenarios and examples - In progress
-
Other useful documents
- KDL Guidance to project partners questionnaire
- SUP Amenability to archiving assessment
- KDL Checklist for Digital Outputs Assessment in the REF
- DSDM Agile Project Framework Handbook
- FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- KDL HR Roles
- AHRC Data Management Plan (external)
- UK Dataservice Data Management Checklist
- Tips on data collection