-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
L2: Project Review Record guidance
This document is updated incrementally at the end of each increment. It is used to capture feedback from the review of the solution; to capture learning points; and, if appropriate, to describe benefits. Typically the analyst in the project is responsible to keep it up to date and to align with project management tools (e.g. ActiveCollab, ClickUp) used by the development team and by the lab and project managers to monitor progress, guide communication with partners, check deadlines are respected, track time estimates on a task and against the overall project budget.
The template can be shared with partners in its entirety and/or following each review meeting with partners, shared as a snippet recording progress for each specific increment.
In this section the prioritised high level requirements extracted from the Product quote and/or as modified at the kick off meeting are added as reference to guide the timebox and increment plans.
If applicable, a list of links to other documents or resources such as Product quote or external sites of reference are added here.
Add the number to record the current increment. It's advisable to keep one an increment 'draft' that can be copy-pasted and filled in ahead of each meeting
Record when the meeting is taking place
Team members attending the meeting
Record the percentage of budget spent so far
Confirm what has been delivered and what has not
Focused on the process, practices employed and contributing roles and responsibilities
Record the actions that came out of the meeting and who they are assigned to
Record when the meeting is taking place
Team members attending the meeting
Opportunity for each member of the research team(s) to introduce themselves
Explain the roles and responsibilities of each team member
Explain the organisation of project work by task, the type of documentation that is produced during the project, and decide on the best channel of communication for the team
Introduce the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and address any Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). If available, link to a source (e.g. a webpage)
Explain the MoSCoW (Must, Should, Could, Wont) technique used to prioritise tasks
Identify the task(s) that is going to be delivered at the end of the first increment
Decide on a date for the next meeting
Any discussion items raised by the other research team(s)
Record the actions that came out of the meeting and who they are assigned to
Software Development Life Cycle. King's Digital Lab. 2025
-
- A2: Terms of Reference guidance
- B2: Project Approach Questionnaire guidance
- F2: Feasibility guidance
- I2: Product Quote guidance
- J2: Statement of Work guidance
- Data Management Plan guidance and AHRC template
- L2: Project Review Record guidance
- N2: Web Hosting and Infrastructure Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Q2: Decommissioning Authorisation guidance
-
Monitoring Methods - In progress
- Z1: RSE Team Mission and Activities
- V1: How do we approach analysis when a project is funded
- Meetings
- Peer review
- Task management
- Budgeting and resource planning
-
Scenarios and examples - In progress
-
Other useful documents
- KDL Guidance to project partners questionnaire
- SUP Amenability to archiving assessment
- KDL Checklist for Digital Outputs Assessment in the REF
- DSDM Agile Project Framework Handbook
- FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- KDL HR Roles
- AHRC Data Management Plan (external)
- UK Dataservice Data Management Checklist
- Tips on data collection